<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dirty Hippies &#187; Deregulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dirtyhippies.org/category/deregulation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dirtyhippies.org</link>
	<description>Democracy. Unwashed.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 06:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>175 Chickens in 1 Minute?!</title>
		<link>http://dirtyhippies.org/2012/04/11/175-chickens-in-1-minute/</link>
		<comments>http://dirtyhippies.org/2012/04/11/175-chickens-in-1-minute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Boyce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food and Drink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicken industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food inspection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pink slime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poultry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirtyhippies.org/?p=2120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The USDA has decided in its infinite wisdom, despite pink slime and a few other debacles of the food industry, to test a program allowing chicken companies to check their own livestock and decide whether or not the chickens are safe to eat. The USDA claims this will save them tens of millions of dollars. Well, USDA, I can save you even more. If you're going to let the chicken companies inspect their own chickens, just trash the whole program.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d think the USDA would see the flaw of logic in letting the people who make the food <i>inspect</i> the food and decide if it is actually safe to eat.</p>
<p>The USDA has decided in its infinite wisdom, despite pink slime and a few other debacles of the food industry, to test a program <a href="http://handpickednation.com/watch/let-them-eat-chicken/">allowing chicken companies to check their own livestock</a> and decide whether or not the chickens are safe to eat.</p>
<p>The USDA claims this will save them tens of millions of dollars.</p>
<p>Well, USDA, I can save you even more. If you&#8217;re going to let the chicken companies inspect their own chickens, just trash the whole program, because I guarantee you they will decide &#8220;ALL of our chickens are safe!&#8221;</p>
<p>At some point, you would hope someone at the USDA (and I looked it up, there are over 100,000 employees there) would have raised their hand and pointed out the glaringly obvious: &#8220;Uh, since these guys are selling us chicken/beef/fish/whatever, don&#8217;t you think they are going to say that <em>everything</em> they&#8217;re selling is safe?&#8221;</p>
<p>Ideally, another person (we&#8217;re up to 2 out of 100,000 &#8211; a push perhaps, but I woke up optimistic this morning) would have seconded the first person&#8217;s statement and then, just maybe, we could have our food actually inspected before we eat it.</p>
<p>Which, I will point out to the USDA and its 100,000 employees, is generally considered to be their core job.</p>
<p>And it gets worse.<span id="more-2120"></span></p>
<p>Right now, the USDA inspectors (who are independent, don&#8217;t work for the chicken companies, and aren&#8217;t driven by chicken company profits for holiday bonuses) inspect 35 chickens a minute for lovely things like bile, feces and random spare parts that got through processing.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a chicken every two seconds.</p>
<p>Should you so desire, take two seconds to inspect the next chicken you see at the store. It&#8217;s really not a lot of time, but with some practice you could get pretty good at it &#8211; which is a nice thought because you are essentially performing the task that stands between me eating a relatively clean chicken or a feces- and bile-covered chicken. (There is a difference, Mr. USDA, trust me on this one.)</p>
<p>Well, under this new program, the chicken companies will rubber stamp &#8211; er, I mean inspect 175 chickens a minute. 175! That&#8217;s just under three chickens a second.</p>
<p>Are you thinking, &#8220;Wait a minute, 175 chickens a minute? That&#8217;s <em>impossible!&#8221;</em> Well congratulations &#8211; you are now ahead of 100,000 USDA employees in the class on food safety.</p>
<p>I have a little test for you and the USDA: if you can even count to 175 in sixty seconds, I might reconsider my opposition.</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t, you need to <a href="http://www.change.org/petitions/united-states-department-of-agriculture-usda-please-don-t-let-the-foxes-guard-the-hen-house" target="_hplink">sign this petition</a>, share it with the world, put it up on Facebook.</p>
<p>Even better, if you know anyone at the USDA, send it to them and ask them to see what they can do for you, for me, and for everyone who prefers their chickens to be properly inspected, let alone inspected at all.</p>
<p><em>This post originally appeared at <a href="http://www.handpickednation.com">HandPicked Nation</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dirtyhippies.org/2012/04/11/175-chickens-in-1-minute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten Years Ago We Were Paying Off The Nation&#8217;s Debt. But Then We Elected Obama.</title>
		<link>http://dirtyhippies.org/2011/08/09/ten-years-ago-we-were-paying-off-the-nations-debt-but-then-we-elected-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://dirtyhippies.org/2011/08/09/ten-years-ago-we-were-paying-off-the-nations-debt-but-then-we-elected-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush II Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirtyhippies.org/?p=1580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Just ten years ago this country was running huge surpluses and paying off its debt. But then we elected Obama and all hell broke loose. <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2011/07/golden_oldie_di.htm">Oh, wait</a>&#8230;</p> <p>Something Happened</p> <p>Between the time ten years ago when we had big surpluses and were paying off the debt and now when we are told the &#8220;Obama [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just ten years ago this country was running huge surpluses and paying off its debt.  But then we elected Obama and all hell broke loose.  <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2011/07/golden_oldie_di.htm">Oh, wait</a>&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Something Happened</strong></p>
<p>Between the time ten years ago when we had big surpluses and were paying off the debt and now when we are told the &#8220;Obama spending and deficit&#8221; mean we have to cut back  on the things We, the People do for each other, <strong>something <em>happened</em>.</strong>  Something <em>changed</em>.  The things that happened, the things that changed, are being ignored in the current DC discussion about what we need to do to fix things.</p>
<p><strong>Separation From Reality</strong></p>
<p>This DC/Tea Party argument over deficits and the Reagan/Bush debt is completely separated from facts and history.  <strong>And it is completely separated from what the public wants.</strong>  There are things that we are supposed to just not remember and which seem to be taboo in the national media. There are things that are &#8220;off the table&#8221; for discussion, and certainly for solving our problems.</p>
<p>But here is some reality anyway, even if we&#8217;re not supposed to see it.  <strong>Just ten years ago we were paying off debt at a rate that would have completely paid it all off by now.</strong>  But under George W. Bush we cut taxes for the rich and more than doubled military spending.  We deregulated and stopped enforcing laws.  We let the big corporations run rampant.  Our federal budget turned from huge surpluses to massive deficits, and Bush said it was &#8220;<a href="http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010020504/roots-conservative-failure-bush-called-deficits-incredibly-positive-news">incredibly positive news</a>&#8221; because it would lead to a debt crisis they could use to shock people into letting the corporate right privatize and thereby profit.  </p>
<p>And then, under and because of Bush, our economy collapsed.</p>
<p><strong>Deficits From Tax Cuts And Military Spending</strong></p>
<p>Once again: <strong>the deficits are the direct result of tax cuts for the rich, and huge increases in military spending</strong>.  Then that <a href="http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010020717/huge-2009-budget-deficit-just-one-more-conservative-failure">huge jump in already-large deficits up past the trillion-dollar level that occurred in Bush&#8217;s last budget</a> was the result of the Bush-caused financial collapse.  The economy collapsed and the government stepped in with hundreds of billions, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Total_Wall_Street_Bailout_Cost">even trillions</a>, to rescue the wealthy, with &#8220;bailouts,&#8221; while doing little, even cutting back, on what our government does for We, the People. That all happened in Bush&#8217;s last budget year, not Obama&#8217;s first.</p>
<p><strong>To Fix The Damage, Undo The Cause</strong></p>
<p>The way to fix deficits is to undo the damage Bush did, by raising taxes on the rich, and cutting back the huge, bloated, extreme, massive, astonishing, incredible, stratospheric military budget.  And we have to boost the economy by <em>investing</em> in rebuilding our infrastructure to get people employed.  <a href="http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010031222/ten-million-jobs-needed-ten-million-jobs-need-doing">We have millions of jobs that need doing, while millions are looking for jobs</a>.  Then those people will be paying taxes instead of collecting unemployment and food stamps.  And the infrastructure improvements will bosst our economy&#8217;s competitiveness.  This is all so simple and obvious that only DC insider types could miss it.</p>
<p><strong>Taxes And Spending = Democracy</strong></p>
<p><strong>Cutting spending doesn&#8217;t cut the need, it shifts the burden.</strong> Cutting government spending does not cut the costs to society and the overall economy of meeting those needs.  Cutting government spending just shifts &#8212; or <em>privatizes</em> &#8212; those costs onto the backs of people who can&#8217;t afford to spend that money.  That need and cost is still there in the economy, except without government &#8212; democracy &#8212; handling it, doing it for all of us, less expensively.  Cutting government&#8217;s role opens those functions up to private profit, instead of We, the People taking care of and watching out for each other &#8212; and making the decisions.</p>
<p>Do you really think that if you phase out Medicare, that old people won&#8217;t still need the medical care?  Of course they will still need it, but the government won&#8217;t be negotiating cost-savings for them, they&#8217;ll be on their own, up against the giant insurance monopolies.</p>
<p><strong>In the 1950s the top tax rate was 90%</strong>, and the country&#8217;s economy worked a lot better for a lot more of us.  We didn&#8217;t have big deficits.  We certainly weren&#8217;t piling up huge debt.  With high tax rates at the top, <a href="http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010104111/how-tax-cuts-rich-made-between-business-predatory">predatory, sell-the-farm business models didn&#8217;t make sense</a>.  We were investing in infrastructure, and that infrastructure made us competitive in world markets.  We as a people were doing better every year, paying our bills, getting educated and becoming more civilized. This empowerment led to demands for equal rights for all of us.   </p>
<p><strong>Ignored By Media</strong></p>
<p>The &#8220;both sides do it&#8221; major media is simply ignoring the majority of the public.  But people aren&#8217;t fooled.  Poll after poll (did I already say that?) shows that the public &#8220;gets it.&#8221;  Poll after poll shows that the public wants our government to address <em>jobs, not deficits</em>, to restore top tax rates, to invest in America&#8217;s infrastructure, to leave Social Security and Medicare alone (<em>or increase them</em>,) and to put more money into education.  <em>Poll after poll</em>.</p>
<p><strong>The Public Wants Jobs</strong></p>
<p>The public gets it.  Poll after poll shows that Americans want their government focused on jobs, not deficits.  The latest, <a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2011/images/08/08/rel13b.pdf">from CNN, taken August 5-7</a>, shows 49% of Americans think unemployment is the biggest issue facing the country, while only 27% say deficits.  Only 16% say the deficit is the country&#8217;s biggest problem.</p>
<p><strong>Rebuild The Dream</strong></p>
<p>The <a href="http://rebuildthedream.com/">The American Dream Movement</a> is rolling out their <a href="http://contract.rebuildthedream.com/">Contract for the American Dream</a>.  The Tea-Party-fascinated press is largely ignoring this, but this movement represents the majority of the public, and can&#8217;t be ignored for long. <strong>I&#8217;ll be writing more about it later.</strong></p>
<p>Also the <a href="http://www.ourfuture.org/conference">Take Back the American Dream conference</a> is coming up on Oct. 3.  Click through and learn more.</p>
<p><em>This post originally appeared at <a href="http://www.ourfuture.org/">Campaign for America&#8217;s Future</a> (CAF) at their <a href="http://www.ourfuture.org/blog">Blog for OurFuture</a>.  I am a Fellow with CAF.</em></p>
<p><em><a href="http://caf.democracyinaction.org/o/11002/t/43/content.jsp?content_KEY=1">Sign up here for the CAF daily summary</a>.</em></p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.twitter.com/dcjohnson" target="_blank"><img style="margin-right:10px" src="http://i1205.photobucket.com/albums/bb422/OurFuture/FollowDaveJohnsonOnTwitter.gif" width="250"></a><a href="http://www.twitter.com/ourfuturedotorg"><img src="http://i1205.photobucket.com/albums/bb422/OurFuture/FollowCAFonTwitter.gif" width="250"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dirtyhippies.org/2011/08/09/ten-years-ago-we-were-paying-off-the-nations-debt-but-then-we-elected-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
