<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analysis: Dillard&#8217;s and an unsatisfying response on the Heroic Media controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dirtyhippies.org/2011/03/17/analysis-dillards-and-an-unsatisfying-response-on-the-heroic-media-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dirtyhippies.org/2011/03/17/analysis-dillards-and-an-unsatisfying-response-on-the-heroic-media-controversy/</link>
	<description>Democracy. Unwashed.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 22:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Smith</title>
		<link>http://dirtyhippies.org/2011/03/17/analysis-dillards-and-an-unsatisfying-response-on-the-heroic-media-controversy/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirtyhippies.org/?p=707#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Upon further review, you&#039;re right - not passive voice. Pure weasel and misdirection, but not passive.

As for that pet peeve, the issue isn&#039;t &quot;don&#039;t know what it means,&quot; but instead was more like &quot;got in a hurry and got a tad careless.&quot; The process of earning BA, MA and PhD, all with a hefty dose of English and writing involved, taught me to know better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon further review, you&#8217;re right &#8211; not passive voice. Pure weasel and misdirection, but not passive.</p>
<p>As for that pet peeve, the issue isn&#8217;t &#8220;don&#8217;t know what it means,&#8221; but instead was more like &#8220;got in a hurry and got a tad careless.&#8221; The process of earning BA, MA and PhD, all with a hefty dose of English and writing involved, taught me to know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: English Teacher</title>
		<link>http://dirtyhippies.org/2011/03/17/analysis-dillards-and-an-unsatisfying-response-on-the-heroic-media-controversy/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>English Teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dirtyhippies.org/?p=707#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Not disagreeing with your content in any way, but I want to ask you not to use the term &quot;passive voice&quot;. As a language teacher, I have a peeve about people castigating the passive voice when they don&#039;t really know what it is and can&#039;t identify it when they see it. The sentence you identify as &quot;a passive voice swamp&quot; is not actually in the passive voice, it&#039;s in the active voice:
“We sincerely regret that a store manager, without prior authorization, allowed a contrary impression to be created.”
A passive voice version of the same sentence would be &quot;That a contrary impression was allowed to be created by a store manager without prior authorization is sincerely regretted by us.&quot;

If you want to call it a disgustingly mealy-mouthed non-apology, or an outright lie, by all means go ahead. It appears to be both. But &quot;We sincerely regret&quot; and &quot;a store manager...allowed&quot; are decidedly active voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not disagreeing with your content in any way, but I want to ask you not to use the term &#8220;passive voice&#8221;. As a language teacher, I have a peeve about people castigating the passive voice when they don&#8217;t really know what it is and can&#8217;t identify it when they see it. The sentence you identify as &#8220;a passive voice swamp&#8221; is not actually in the passive voice, it&#8217;s in the active voice:<br />
“We sincerely regret that a store manager, without prior authorization, allowed a contrary impression to be created.”<br />
A passive voice version of the same sentence would be &#8220;That a contrary impression was allowed to be created by a store manager without prior authorization is sincerely regretted by us.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you want to call it a disgustingly mealy-mouthed non-apology, or an outright lie, by all means go ahead. It appears to be both. But &#8220;We sincerely regret&#8221; and &#8220;a store manager&#8230;allowed&#8221; are decidedly active voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
